Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs JFNCX
FSPHX vs JFNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. JFNCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and JFNCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.22B vs. JFNCX (4.95B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than JFNCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs JFNCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than JFNCX: FSPHX (44 years) vs JFNCX (16 years). JFNCX (1.76) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. JFNCX (35.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than JFNCX: FSPHX (0) vs JFNCX (2500). JFNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.61 vs. FSPHX (-3.95). JFNCX return over 5 years is better than : 6.46 vs. FSPHX (-11.15).
| FSPHX | JFNCX | FSPHX / JFNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.76 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.76 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.972 | 18.281 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.22B | 4.95B | 126% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.95 | 2.61 | -151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.32 | 21.06 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.15 | 6.46 | -173% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.88 | 31.59 | 133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers