Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs JFNCX
FSPHX vs JFNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. JFNCX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and JFNCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.67B vs. JFNCX (5.39B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than JFNCX: FSPHX (0.01) vs JFNCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than JFNCX: FSPHX (44 years) vs JFNCX (16 years). JFNCX (1.76) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. JFNCX (30.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than JFNCX: FSPHX (0) vs JFNCX (2500). JFNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.43 vs. FSPHX (11.48). JFNCX return over 5 years is better than : 8.09 vs. FSPHX (-2.50).
| FSPHX | JFNCX | FSPHX / JFNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.76 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.76 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.688 | 18.613 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.67B | 5.39B | 124% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.48 | 16.43 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.67 | 17.48 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.50 | 8.09 | -31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.01 | 38.10 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers