Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs JFNCX
FSPHX vs JFNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. JFNCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and JFNCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.28B vs. JFNCX (5.36B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than JFNCX: FSPHX (0.43) vs JFNCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than JFNCX: FSPHX (45 years) vs JFNCX (17 years). JFNCX (1.76) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. JFNCX (30.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than JFNCX: FSPHX (0) vs JFNCX (2500). JFNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.99 vs. FSPHX (-0.62). JFNCX return over 5 years is better than : 4.98 vs. FSPHX (-14.42).
| FSPHX | JFNCX | FSPHX / JFNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.76 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.76 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 0.803 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.28B | 5.36B | 117% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.62 | 11.99 | -5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.66 | 16.74 | 4% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.42 | 4.98 | -290% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.31 | 68.62 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers