Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs JFNAX
FSPHX vs JFNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. JFNAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and JFNAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.28B vs. JFNAX (5.36B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than JFNAX: FSPHX (0.43) vs JFNAX (0.32). FSPHX was incepted earlier than JFNAX: FSPHX (45 years) vs JFNAX (17 years). JFNAX (0.98) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. JFNAX (30.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than JFNAX: FSPHX (0) vs JFNAX (2500). JFNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.65 vs. FSPHX (0.29). JFNAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.67 vs. FSPHX (-13.13).
| FSPHX | JFNAX | FSPHX / JFNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.98 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.98 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.809 | 1.014 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.28B | 5.36B | 117% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.32 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.29 | 14.65 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.47 | 22.50 | 7% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.13 | 13.67 | -96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.61 | 92.67 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement