Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs HGHYX
FSPHX vs HGHYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HGHYX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and HGHYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.67B vs. HGHYX (853M). HGHYX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: HGHYX (0.29) vs FSPHX (0.01). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HGHYX: FSPHX (44 years) vs HGHYX (26 years). HGHYX (1.03) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX (40.00) and HGHYX (40.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGHYX: FSPHX (0) vs HGHYX (250000). HGHYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.72 vs. FSPHX (3.63). HGHYX return over 5 years is better than : 0.59 vs. FSPHX (-9.36).
| FSPHX | HGHYX | FSPHX / HGHYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.03 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.03 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.688 | 13.575 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.67B | 853M | 782% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.29 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.63 | 11.72 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.67 | 14.65 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.36 | 0.59 | -1,595% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.59 | 24.66 | 152% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement