Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs HGHIX
FSPHX vs HGHIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HGHIX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and HGHIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.67B vs. HGHIX (853M). HGHIX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: HGHIX (0.36) vs FSPHX (0.01). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HGHIX: FSPHX (44 years) vs HGHIX (19 years). HGHIX (1.02) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX (40.00) and HGHIX (40.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGHIX: FSPHX (0) vs HGHIX (2000). HGHIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.29 vs. FSPHX (4.50). HGHIX return over 5 years is better than : -1.46 vs. FSPHX (-2.50).
| FSPHX | HGHIX | FSPHX / HGHIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.02 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.02 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.688 | 13.162 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.67B | 853M | 782% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.36 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.50 | 11.29 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.88 | 13.63 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.50 | -1.46 | 172% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.35 | 17.67 | 279% |