Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs HGHFX
FSPHX vs HGHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HGHFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and HGHFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.28B vs. HGHFX (841M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than HGHFX: FSPHX (0.43) vs HGHFX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HGHFX: FSPHX (45 years) vs HGHFX (9 years). HGHFX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). HGHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGHFX: FSPHX (0) vs HGHFX (1000000). HGHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.62 vs. FSPHX (0.29). HGHFX return over 5 years is better than : -5.13 vs. FSPHX (-13.13).
| FSPHX | HGHFX | FSPHX / HGHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.92 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.92 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.809 | -0.370 | -219% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.28B | 841M | 746% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.29 | 5.62 | 5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.47 | 12.99 | 11% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.13 | -5.13 | 256% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.61 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement