Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs HGHFX
FSPHX vs HGHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HGHFX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and HGHFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.67B vs. HGHFX (853M). HGHFX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: HGHFX (0.46) vs FSPHX (0.01). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HGHFX: FSPHX (44 years) vs HGHFX (9 years). HGHFX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX (40.00) and HGHFX (40.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGHFX: FSPHX (0) vs HGHFX (1000000). FSPHX (11.48) and HGHFX (11.44) have marching annual gain over last year. HGHFX return over 5 years is better than : -0.81 vs. FSPHX (-2.50).
| FSPHX | HGHFX | FSPHX / HGHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.92 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.92 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.688 | 13.313 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.67B | 853M | 782% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.46 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.48 | 11.44 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.67 | 14.06 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.50 | -0.81 | 307% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.01 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement