Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs HGHAX
FSPHX vs HGHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HGHAX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and HGHAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.28B vs. HGHAX (841M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than HGHAX: FSPHX (0.43) vs HGHAX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HGHAX: FSPHX (45 years) vs HGHAX (26 years). HGHAX (1.29) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). HGHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGHAX: FSPHX (0) vs HGHAX (2000). HGHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.83 vs. FSPHX (0.29). HGHAX return over 5 years is better than : -8.49 vs. FSPHX (-13.13).
| FSPHX | HGHAX | FSPHX / HGHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.29 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.29 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.809 | -0.412 | -196% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.28B | 841M | 746% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.29 | 4.83 | 6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.47 | 10.80 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.13 | -8.49 | 155% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.61 | 32.16 | 195% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement