Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs HGHAX
FSPHX vs HGHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HGHAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and HGHAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.22B vs. HGHAX (837M). HGHAX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: HGHAX (0.18) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HGHAX: FSPHX (44 years) vs HGHAX (26 years). HGHAX (1.29) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX (40.00) and HGHAX (40.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGHAX: FSPHX (0) vs HGHAX (2000). HGHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.95 vs. FSPHX (-5.87). FSPHX (-12.12) and HGHAX (-12.58) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSPHX | HGHAX | FSPHX / HGHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.29 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.29 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.761 | 12.040 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.22B | 837M | 743% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.18 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.87 | -0.95 | 620% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.94 | 11.52 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.12 | -12.58 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.27 | 0.79 | 5,213% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement