Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs GTHCX
FSPHX vs GTHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. GTHCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and GTHCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.22B vs. GTHCX (1.26B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than GTHCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs GTHCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than GTHCX: FSPHX (44 years) vs GTHCX (27 years). GTHCX (1.80) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). GTHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTHCX: FSPHX (0) vs GTHCX (1000). GTHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.61 vs. FSPHX (-3.95). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -11.15 vs. GTHCX (-33.16).
| FSPHX | GTHCX | FSPHX / GTHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.80 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.80 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.972 | 15.663 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.22B | 1.26B | 494% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.95 | -2.61 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.32 | 13.41 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.15 | -33.16 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.88 | -40.25 | -104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement