Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs GTHCX
FSPHX vs GTHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. GTHCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a StrongBuy and GTHCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.67B vs. GTHCX (1.26B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than GTHCX: FSPHX (0.01) vs GTHCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than GTHCX: FSPHX (44 years) vs GTHCX (27 years). GTHCX (1.80) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). GTHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTHCX: FSPHX (0) vs GTHCX (1000). GTHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.65 vs. FSPHX (-2.08). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -9.00 vs. GTHCX (-34.01).
| FSPHX | GTHCX | FSPHX / GTHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.80 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.80 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.028 | 17.008 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.67B | 1.26B | 530% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.08 | -0.65 | 323% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.82 | 8.57 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.00 | -34.01 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.40 | -40.87 | -99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers