Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs GTHCX
FSPHX vs GTHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. GTHCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and GTHCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.96B vs. GTHCX (1.24B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than GTHCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs GTHCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than GTHCX: FSPHX (44 years) vs GTHCX (27 years). GTHCX (1.80) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). GTHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTHCX: FSPHX (0) vs GTHCX (1000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.25 vs. GTHCX (-10.32). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -13.08 vs. GTHCX (-34.52).
| FSPHX | GTHCX | FSPHX / GTHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.80 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.80 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.358 | 9.760 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.96B | 1.24B | 483% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.25 | -10.32 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.28 | 11.32 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.08 | -34.52 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.84 | -41.70 | -93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement