Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs GGHSX
FSPHX vs GGHSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. GGHSX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a StrongBuy and GGHSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.67B vs. GGHSX (1.26B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than GGHSX: FSPHX (0.01) vs GGHSX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than GGHSX: FSPHX (44 years) vs GGHSX (9 years). GGHSX (0.71) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). GGHSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGHSX: FSPHX (0) vs GGHSX (1000000). GGHSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.63 vs. FSPHX (-1.95). GGHSX return over 5 years is better than : -6.31 vs. FSPHX (-7.43).
| FSPHX | GGHSX | FSPHX / GGHSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.71 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.71 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.394 | 19.325 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.67B | 1.26B | 530% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.01 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.95 | 6.63 | -29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.17 | 19.29 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.43 | -6.31 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.85 | N/A | - |