Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs GGHSX
FSPHX vs GGHSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. GGHSX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and GGHSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.36B vs. GGHSX (1.25B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than GGHSX: FSPHX (0.43) vs GGHSX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than GGHSX: FSPHX (45 years) vs GGHSX (9 years). GGHSX (0.71) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). GGHSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGHSX: FSPHX (0) vs GGHSX (1000000). GGHSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.27 vs. FSPHX (4.21). FSPHX (-12.92) and GGHSX (-13.01) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSPHX | GGHSX | FSPHX / GGHSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.71 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.71 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.774 | 0.561 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.36B | 1.25B | 507% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.21 | 8.27 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.83 | 14.17 | 13% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.92 | -13.01 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.06 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement