Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs GGHCX
FSPHX vs GGHCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. GGHCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and GGHCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.22B vs. GGHCX (1.26B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than GGHCX: FSPHX (0.02) vs GGHCX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than GGHCX: FSPHX (44 years) vs GGHCX (36 years). GGHCX (1.05) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). GGHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGHCX: FSPHX (0) vs GGHCX (1000). GGHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.46 vs. FSPHX (-5.87). GGHCX return over 5 years is better than : -9.54 vs. FSPHX (-12.12).
| FSPHX | GGHCX | FSPHX / GGHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.05 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.05 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.761 | 17.028 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.22B | 1.26B | 494% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.87 | 3.46 | -169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.94 | 22.52 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.12 | -9.54 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.27 | -2.75 | -1,499% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement