Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs FTDZX
FSPHX vs FTDZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. FTDZX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and FTDZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.96B vs. FTDZX (915M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than FTDZX: FSPHX (0.02) vs FTDZX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than FTDZX: FSPHX (44 years) vs FTDZX (16 years). FTDZX (0.78) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FTDZX (21.87). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTDZX: FSPHX (0) vs FTDZX (100000). FTDZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.13 vs. FSPHX (-9.25). FTDZX return over 5 years is better than : -8.11 vs. FSPHX (-13.08).
| FSPHX | FTDZX | FSPHX / FTDZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.77 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.78 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.358 | 34.289 | 16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.96B | 915M | 652% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.25 | 7.13 | -130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.28 | 58.46 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.08 | -8.11 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.84 | 5.09 | 764% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement