Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs FTDZX
FSPHX vs FTDZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. FTDZX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and FTDZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.28B vs. FTDZX (1.03B). FTDZX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: FTDZX (2.00) vs FSPHX (0.43). FSPHX was incepted earlier than FTDZX: FSPHX (45 years) vs FTDZX (16 years). FTDZX (0.78) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FTDZX (21.87). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTDZX: FSPHX (0) vs FTDZX (100000). FTDZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.72 vs. FSPHX (0.29). FTDZX return over 5 years is better than : -3.71 vs. FSPHX (-13.13).
| FSPHX | FTDZX | FSPHX / FTDZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.77 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.78 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 45 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.809 | 1.860 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.28B | 1.03B | 609% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 2.00 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.29 | 40.72 | 1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.47 | 56.30 | 3% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.13 | -3.71 | 354% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.61 | 52.62 | 119% |