Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPCX vs SBFAX
FSPCX vs SBFAX Comparison
Open Charts FSPCX vs SBFAX
Fidelity Select Insurance Port
Price$89.17
Change+$0.63 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets872.44M
1919 Financial Services A
Price$28.74
Change+$0.25 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.28M
FSPCX vs SBFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPCX vs. SBFAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPCX is a Buy and SBFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPCX has more cash in the bank: 872M vs. SBFAX (110M). FSPCX pays higher dividends than SBFAX: FSPCX (1.03) vs SBFAX (0.64). FSPCX was incepted earlier than SBFAX: FSPCX (40 years) vs SBFAX (27 years). SBFAX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FSPCX (0.69). FSPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. SBFAX (4.00). FSPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBFAX: FSPCX (0) vs SBFAX (1000). SBFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.16 vs. FSPCX (-10.08). FSPCX return over 5 years is better than : 76.13 vs. SBFAX (31.31).
| FSPCX | SBFAX | FSPCX / SBFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.46 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.46 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.746 | -0.931 | 188% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 872M | 110M | 793% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.64 | 160% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.08 | -9.16 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.90 | 2.59 | 1,310% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.13 | 31.31 | 243% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.28 | 47.26 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement