Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPCX vs SBFAX
FSPCX vs SBFAX Comparison
Open Charts FSPCX vs SBFAX
Fidelity Select Insurance Port
Price$90.68
Change+$0.23 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets752.14M
1919 Financial Services A
Price$29.03
Change-$0.32 (-1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52M
FSPCX vs SBFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPCX vs. SBFAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPCX is a Buy and SBFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPCX has more cash in the bank: 752M vs. SBFAX (112M). FSPCX pays higher dividends than SBFAX: FSPCX (1.12) vs SBFAX (0.68). FSPCX was incepted earlier than SBFAX: FSPCX (40 years) vs SBFAX (27 years). SBFAX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FSPCX (0.69). FSPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. SBFAX (4.00). FSPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBFAX: FSPCX (0) vs SBFAX (1000). FSPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.15 vs. SBFAX (-11.90). FSPCX return over 5 years is better than : 63.72 vs. SBFAX (17.56).
| FSPCX | SBFAX | FSPCX / SBFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.46 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.46 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.370 | 1.172 | -32% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 752M | 112M | 671% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.68 | 165% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.15 | -11.90 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.83 | -0.46 | -5,569% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.72 | 17.56 | 363% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.75 | 47.34 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement