Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSOAX vs MVCAX
FSOAX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts FSOAX vs MVCAX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies A
Price$45.78
Change+$0.57 (+1.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.7B
FSOAX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSOAX vs. MVCAX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSOAX is a Buy and MVCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 17B vs. FSOAX (1.7B). MVCAX pays higher dividends than FSOAX: MVCAX (0.83) vs FSOAX (0.78). FSOAX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: FSOAX (29 years) vs MVCAX (24 years). FSOAX (1.09) is less costly to investors than MVCAX (1.00). FSOAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. MVCAX (27.00). FSOAX (6%) and MVCAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FSOAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MVCAX: FSOAX (0) vs MVCAX (1000). MVCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.54 vs. FSOAX (-11.53). FSOAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.29 vs. MVCAX (32.80).
| FSOAX | MVCAX | FSOAX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.99 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.00 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.614 | 5.965 | 111% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.7B | 17B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 0.83 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.53 | -9.54 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.84 | 11.01 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.29 | 32.80 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.43 | 73.95 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement