Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSNLX vs RDBTX
FSNLX vs RDBTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSNLX vs. RDBTX commentary
Jul 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSNLX is a Hold and RDBTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RDBTX has more cash in the bank: 4.82B vs. FSNLX (4.38B). FSNLX (2.74) and RDBTX (2.65) have matching dividends . FSNLX was incepted earlier than RDBTX: FSNLX (8 years) vs RDBTX (18 years). RDBTX (0.64) is less costly to investors than FSNLX (0.46). FSNLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. RDBTX (6.00). FSNLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDBTX: FSNLX (0) vs RDBTX (250). RDBTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.25 vs. FSNLX (6.02). RDBTX return over 5 years is better than : 21.47 vs. FSNLX (7.15).
| FSNLX | RDBTX | FSNLX / RDBTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.64 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.64 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.563 | 7.774 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.38B | 4.82B | 91% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.74 | 2.65 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.02 | 8.25 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.55 | 21.37 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.15 | 21.47 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 33.70 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement