Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSNLX vs RBEJX
FSNLX vs RBEJX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSNLX vs. RBEJX commentary
Aug 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSNLX is a Hold and RBEJX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBEJX has more cash in the bank: 4.77B vs. FSNLX (4.38B). FSNLX pays higher dividends than RBEJX: FSNLX (2.74) vs RBEJX (2.31). FSNLX was incepted earlier than RBEJX: FSNLX (8 years) vs RBEJX (11 years). RBEJX (1.10) is less costly to investors than FSNLX (0.45). FSNLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. RBEJX (6.00). FSNLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBEJX: FSNLX (0) vs RBEJX (250). RBEJX (6.51) and FSNLX (6.19) have marching annual gain over last year. RBEJX return over 5 years is better than : 16.97 vs. FSNLX (5.90).
| FSNLX | RBEJX | FSNLX / RBEJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.10 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.10 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.739 | 7.244 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.38B | 4.77B | 92% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.74 | 2.31 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.19 | 6.51 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.76 | 16.39 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.90 | 16.97 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 28.37 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers