Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSNIX vs RLBAX
FSNIX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSNIX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% I
Price$17.65
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.68B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.62
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.37B
FSNIX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSNIX vs. RLBAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSNIX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 265B vs. FSNIX (4.68B). FSNIX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FSNIX (1.86) vs RLBAX (1.10). FSNIX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSNIX (18 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSNIX (0.69). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSNIX (17.00). FSNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSNIX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSNIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.76 vs. RLBAX (7.84). RLBAX (37.69) and FSNIX (37.00) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSNIX | RLBAX | FSNIX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.31 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.31 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.944 | 13.947 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.68B | 265B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 1.10 | 169% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.76 | 7.84 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.61 | 47.39 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.00 | 37.69 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.26 | 67.66 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement