Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSNIX vs RLBAX
FSNIX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSNIX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% I
Price$17.40
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.09B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.96
Change-$0.07 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
FSNIX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSNIX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSNIX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. FSNIX (5.09B). FSNIX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FSNIX (1.94) vs RLBAX (1.25). FSNIX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSNIX (18 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSNIX (0.70). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSNIX (17.00). FSNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSNIX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSNIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.31 vs. RLBAX (13.33). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.37 vs. FSNIX (27.63).
| FSNIX | RLBAX | FSNIX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.31 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.31 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.992 | 2.290 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.09B | 270B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.94 | 1.25 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.31 | 13.33 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.92 | 34.62 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.63 | 32.37 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.88 | 80.23 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers