Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSNIX vs RLBAX
FSNIX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSNIX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% I
Price$17.20
Change+$0.10 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.55B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.59
Change+$0.20 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets259.11B
FSNIX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSNIX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSNIX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 259B vs. FSNIX (4.55B). FSNIX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FSNIX (1.91) vs RLBAX (1.15). FSNIX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSNIX (18 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSNIX (0.69). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSNIX (17.00). FSNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSNIX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSNIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.05 vs. RLBAX (9.12). FSNIX (36.15) and RLBAX (35.40) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSNIX | RLBAX | FSNIX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.31 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.31 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.298 | 10.805 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.55B | 259B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.91 | 1.15 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.05 | 9.12 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.11 | 37.15 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.15 | 35.40 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.67 | 67.71 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement