Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSNIX vs RLBAX
FSNIX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSNIX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% I
Price$16.75
Change+$0.05 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.44B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$36.52
Change+$0.17 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.39B
FSNIX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSNIX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSNIX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. FSNIX (4.44B). FSNIX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FSNIX (1.96) vs RLBAX (1.18). FSNIX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSNIX (18 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSNIX (0.69). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSNIX (17.00). FSNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSNIX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSNIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.48 vs. RLBAX (7.00). FSNIX return over 5 years is better than : 39.47 vs. RLBAX (37.04).
| FSNIX | RLBAX | FSNIX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.31 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.31 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.134 | 7.651 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.44B | 252B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.96 | 1.18 | 167% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.48 | 7.00 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.65 | 32.45 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.47 | 37.04 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.00 | 58.01 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement