Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSNIX vs RLBAX
FSNIX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FSNIX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% I
Price$17.77
Change-$0.20 (-1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.81B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.66
Change-$0.48 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
FSNIX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSNIX vs. RLBAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSNIX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. FSNIX (4.81B). FSNIX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FSNIX (1.83) vs RLBAX (1.08). FSNIX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FSNIX (18 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSNIX (0.69). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSNIX (17.00). FSNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FSNIX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FSNIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.04 vs. RLBAX (9.08). RLBAX (36.92) and FSNIX (36.08) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSNIX | RLBAX | FSNIX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.31 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.31 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.010 | 15.481 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.81B | 269B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.83 | 1.08 | 169% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.04 | 9.08 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.41 | 40.52 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.08 | 36.92 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.66 | 69.99 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement