Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMMX vs GSGPX
FSMMX vs GSGPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMMX vs. GSGPX commentary
Jun 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMMX is a Hold and GSGPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSGPX has more cash in the bank: 4.82B vs. FSMMX (1.77B). FSMMX pays higher dividends than GSGPX: FSMMX (2.09) vs GSGPX (1.13). FSMMX was incepted earlier than GSGPX: FSMMX (8 years) vs GSGPX (7 years). FSMMX (1.97) is less costly to investors than GSGPX (0.82). FSMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 987.00 vs. GSGPX (179.00). GSGPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSMMX: GSGPX (0) vs FSMMX (2500). GSGPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.64 vs. FSMMX (1.81). FSMMX return over 5 years is better than : 28.27 vs. GSGPX (19.88).
| FSMMX | GSGPX | FSMMX / GSGPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.73 | 270% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.82 | 240% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.090 | 2.106 | 4% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.77B | 4.82B | 37% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.09 | 1.13 | 185% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.81 | 4.64 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.47 | 21.96 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.27 | 19.88 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement