Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMMX vs GCRTX
FSMMX vs GCRTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMMX vs. GCRTX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMMX is a Hold and GCRTX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GCRTX has more cash in the bank: 5.55B vs. FSMMX (1.68B). FSMMX pays higher dividends than GCRTX: FSMMX (2.02) vs GCRTX (0.21). FSMMX was incepted earlier than GCRTX: FSMMX (9 years) vs GCRTX (18 years). FSMMX (1.97) and GCRTX (1.94) have similar cost to investors . FSMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 987.00 vs. GCRTX (179.00). GCRTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSMMX: GCRTX (1000) vs FSMMX (2500). GCRTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.13 vs. FSMMX (3.80). FSMMX return over 5 years is better than : 32.17 vs. GCRTX (9.87).
| FSMMX | GCRTX | FSMMX / GCRTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.85 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.94 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.881 | 8.019 | 48% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.68B | 5.55B | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.02 | 0.21 | 973% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.80 | 6.13 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.48 | 21.11 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.17 | 9.87 | 326% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 16.35 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement