Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMMX vs GCRTX
FSMMX vs GCRTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMMX vs. GCRTX commentary
Jul 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMMX is a Hold and GCRTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GCRTX has more cash in the bank: 4.91B vs. FSMMX (1.77B). FSMMX pays higher dividends than GCRTX: FSMMX (2.08) vs GCRTX (0.22). FSMMX was incepted earlier than GCRTX: FSMMX (8 years) vs GCRTX (17 years). FSMMX (1.97) and GCRTX (1.94) have similar cost to investors . FSMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 987.00 vs. GCRTX (179.00). GCRTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSMMX: GCRTX (1000) vs FSMMX (2500). GCRTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.39 vs. FSMMX (2.18). FSMMX return over 5 years is better than : 29.69 vs. GCRTX (12.90).
| FSMMX | GCRTX | FSMMX / GCRTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.85 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.94 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.993 | 3.302 | 30% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.77B | 4.91B | 36% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.08 | 0.22 | 954% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.18 | 4.39 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.36 | 18.80 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.69 | 12.90 | 230% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 8.41 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement