Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMLX vs WCMNX
FSMLX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts FSMLX vs WCMNX
Franklin Small Cap Growth R6
Price$28.39
Change+$0.04 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.47B
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.49
Change+$0.06 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.06M
FSMLX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMLX vs. WCMNX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMLX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMLX has more cash in the bank: 2.47B vs. WCMNX (43.1M). FSMLX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSMLX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: FSMLX (13 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FSMLX (0.66). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FSMLX (16.31). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSMLX: WCMNX (1000) vs FSMLX (1000000). FSMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.70 vs. WCMNX (-3.16). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 3.45 vs. FSMLX (-8.18).
| FSMLX | WCMNX | FSMLX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.24 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 2.04 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.651 | 6.304 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.47B | 43.1M | 5,735% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.70 | -3.16 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.48 | 22.08 | 201% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.18 | 3.45 | -237% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.39 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement