Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMLX vs WCMNX
FSMLX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts FSMLX vs WCMNX
Franklin Small Cap Growth R6
Price$29.51
Change+$0.47 (+1.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.54B
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.65
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.69M
FSMLX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMLX vs. WCMNX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMLX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMLX has more cash in the bank: 2.54B vs. WCMNX (43.7M). FSMLX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSMLX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: FSMLX (13 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FSMLX (0.66). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FSMLX (16.31). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSMLX: WCMNX (1000) vs FSMLX (1000000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.37 vs. FSMLX (-1.93). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 0.74 vs. FSMLX (-9.35).
| FSMLX | WCMNX | FSMLX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.24 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 2.04 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.805 | 7.486 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.54B | 43.7M | 5,808% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.93 | -1.37 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.07 | 21.03 | 219% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.35 | 0.74 | -1,266% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.55 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement