Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs WAMFX
FSMDX vs WAMFX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs WAMFX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$37.54
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.78B
Boston Trust Walden Midcap
Price$22.78
Change+$0.05 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets173.12M
FSMDX vs WAMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. WAMFX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and WAMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45.8B vs. WAMFX (173M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than WAMFX: FSMDX (1.24) vs WAMFX (0.50). FSMDX was incepted earlier than WAMFX: FSMDX (14 years) vs WAMFX (14 years). WAMFX (1.02) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). WAMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.20 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAMFX: FSMDX (0) vs WAMFX (100000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.14 vs. WAMFX (-2.32). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 46.44 vs. WAMFX (18.21).
| FSMDX | WAMFX | FSMDX / WAMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.00 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.02 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.107 | -1.002 | -1,109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.8B | 173M | 26,474% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 0.50 | 249% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.14 | -2.32 | -394% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.48 | 16.00 | 303% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.44 | 18.21 | 255% |
| Returns for 10 years | 150.32 | 68.88 | 218% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers