Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs TQSMX
FSMDX vs TQSMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs TQSMX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$37.32
Change+$0.30 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.78B
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq
Price$25.46
Change+$0.30 (+1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets991.6M
FSMDX vs TQSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. TQSMX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a StrongBuy and TQSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45.8B vs. TQSMX (992M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than TQSMX: FSMDX (1.24) vs TQSMX (0.51). FSMDX was incepted earlier than TQSMX: FSMDX (14 years) vs TQSMX (10 years). TQSMX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). TQSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.60 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQSMX: FSMDX (0) vs TQSMX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.54 vs. TQSMX (-2.25). TQSMX (49.48) and FSMDX (48.70) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSMDX | TQSMX | FSMDX / TQSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.87 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.90 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.097 | 11.538 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.8B | 992M | 4,617% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 0.51 | 244% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.54 | -2.25 | -68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.99 | 30.26 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.70 | 49.48 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.04 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement