Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs TQSIX
FSMDX vs TQSIX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs TQSIX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$37.32
Change+$0.30 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.78B
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq I
Price$25.59
Change+$0.30 (+1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets991.6M
FSMDX vs TQSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. TQSIX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a StrongBuy and TQSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45.8B vs. TQSIX (992M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than TQSIX: FSMDX (1.24) vs TQSIX (0.63). FSMDX was incepted earlier than TQSIX: FSMDX (14 years) vs TQSIX (10 years). TQSIX (0.71) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). TQSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.60 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQSIX: FSMDX (0) vs TQSIX (500000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.54 vs. TQSIX (-2.04). TQSIX (50.94) and FSMDX (48.70) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSMDX | TQSIX | FSMDX / TQSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.68 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.71 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.097 | 11.762 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.8B | 992M | 4,617% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 0.63 | 197% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.54 | -2.04 | -75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.99 | 31.07 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.70 | 50.94 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.04 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers