Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs TQSIX
FSMDX vs TQSIX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs TQSIX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$36.71
Change+$0.09 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.37B
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq I
Price$24.84
Change+$0.05 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets924.33M
FSMDX vs TQSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. TQSIX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and TQSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45.4B vs. TQSIX (924M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than TQSIX: FSMDX (1.25) vs TQSIX (0.64). FSMDX was incepted earlier than TQSIX: FSMDX (14 years) vs TQSIX (10 years). TQSIX (0.71) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). TQSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.60 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQSIX: FSMDX (0) vs TQSIX (500000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.22 vs. TQSIX (1.40). TQSIX (62.07) and FSMDX (60.38) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSMDX | TQSIX | FSMDX / TQSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.68 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.71 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.702 | 9.427 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.4B | 924M | 4,913% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 0.64 | 195% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.22 | 1.40 | 445% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.29 | 40.56 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.38 | 62.07 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.09 | N/A | - |