Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs TQSIX
FSMDX vs TQSIX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs TQSIX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$38.27
Change+$1.11 (+2.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.87B
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq I
Price$26.83
Change+$1.83 (+7.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
FSMDX vs TQSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. TQSIX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and TQSIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 46.9B vs. TQSIX (1.1B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than TQSIX: FSMDX (1.07) vs TQSIX (0.56). FSMDX was incepted earlier than TQSIX: FSMDX (14 years) vs TQSIX (10 years). TQSIX (0.71) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). TQSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.60 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQSIX: FSMDX (0) vs TQSIX (500000). TQSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.13 vs. FSMDX (10.78). TQSIX return over 5 years is better than : 47.63 vs. FSMDX (44.63).
| FSMDX | TQSIX | FSMDX / TQSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.68 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.71 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.683 | 6.006 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.9B | 1.1B | 4,260% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.56 | 190% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.78 | 15.13 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.55 | 38.48 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.63 | 47.63 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 187.08 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement