Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs TQSAX
FSMDX vs TQSAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs TQSAX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$37.32
Change+$0.30 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.78B
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq Adv
Price$25.40
Change+$0.30 (+1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets991.6M
FSMDX vs TQSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. TQSAX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a StrongBuy and TQSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45.8B vs. TQSAX (992M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than TQSAX: FSMDX (1.24) vs TQSAX (0.32). FSMDX was incepted earlier than TQSAX: FSMDX (14 years) vs TQSAX (10 years). TQSAX (1.41) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). TQSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.60 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQSAX: FSMDX (0) vs TQSAX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.54 vs. TQSAX (-2.52). FSMDX (48.70) and TQSAX (47.83) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSMDX | TQSAX | FSMDX / TQSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.14 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.41 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.097 | 11.273 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.8B | 992M | 4,617% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 0.32 | 382% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.54 | -2.52 | -61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.99 | 29.20 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.70 | 47.83 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.04 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement