Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs SMDVX
FSMDX vs SMDVX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs SMDVX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$38.27
Change+$1.11 (+2.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.87B
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps A
Price$18.52
Change-$0.31 (-1.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets968.96M
FSMDX vs SMDVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. SMDVX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and SMDVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 46.9B vs. SMDVX (969M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than SMDVX: FSMDX (1.07) vs SMDVX (0.20). FSMDX was incepted earlier than SMDVX: FSMDX (14 years) vs SMDVX (20 years). SMDVX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). SMDVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMDVX: FSMDX (0) vs SMDVX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.78 vs. SMDVX (-1.53). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 44.63 vs. SMDVX (5.89).
| FSMDX | SMDVX | FSMDX / SMDVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.16 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.16 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.683 | 3.637 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.9B | 969M | 4,840% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.20 | 531% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.78 | -1.53 | -705% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.55 | 11.49 | 344% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.63 | 5.89 | 757% |
| Returns for 10 years | 187.08 | 85.93 | 218% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement