Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs SMDVX
FSMDX vs SMDVX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs SMDVX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$36.54
Change-$0.66 (-1.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.03B
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps A
Price$18.97
Change-$0.37 (-1.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets965.62M
FSMDX vs SMDVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. SMDVX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and SMDVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45B vs. SMDVX (966M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than SMDVX: FSMDX (1.26) vs SMDVX (0.15). FSMDX was incepted earlier than SMDVX: FSMDX (14 years) vs SMDVX (20 years). SMDVX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). SMDVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMDVX: FSMDX (0) vs SMDVX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.61 vs. SMDVX (-5.36). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 55.70 vs. SMDVX (20.88).
| FSMDX | SMDVX | FSMDX / SMDVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.16 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.16 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.424 | 5.338 | 195% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45B | 966M | 4,658% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 0.15 | 835% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.61 | -5.36 | -86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.53 | 20.06 | 217% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.70 | 20.88 | 267% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.06 | 61.22 | 230% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement