Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs SMDIX
FSMDX vs SMDIX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs SMDIX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$37.68
Change-$0.40 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.78B
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps I
Price$19.13
Change-$0.29 (-1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets883.51M
FSMDX vs SMDIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. SMDIX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a StrongBuy and SMDIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45.8B vs. SMDIX (884M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than SMDIX: FSMDX (1.24) vs SMDIX (0.31). FSMDX was incepted earlier than SMDIX: FSMDX (14 years) vs SMDIX (20 years). SMDIX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). SMDIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMDIX: FSMDX (0) vs SMDIX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.30 vs. SMDIX (-4.14). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 49.97 vs. SMDIX (14.01).
| FSMDX | SMDIX | FSMDX / SMDIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.91 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.91 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.116 | -0.051 | -23,541% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.8B | 884M | 5,181% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 0.31 | 401% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.30 | -4.14 | -128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.03 | 16.68 | 270% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.97 | 14.01 | 357% |
| Returns for 10 years | 150.80 | 79.49 | 190% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement