Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs SMDIX
FSMDX vs SMDIX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs SMDIX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$38.27
Change+$1.11 (+2.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.87B
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps I
Price$19.72
Change-$0.24 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets968.96M
FSMDX vs SMDIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. SMDIX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and SMDIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 46.9B vs. SMDIX (969M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than SMDIX: FSMDX (1.07) vs SMDIX (0.35). FSMDX was incepted earlier than SMDIX: FSMDX (14 years) vs SMDIX (20 years). SMDIX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). SMDIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMDIX: FSMDX (0) vs SMDIX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.78 vs. SMDIX (-0.77). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 44.63 vs. SMDIX (9.33).
| FSMDX | SMDIX | FSMDX / SMDIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.91 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.91 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.683 | 3.680 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.9B | 969M | 4,840% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.35 | 304% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.78 | -0.77 | -1,409% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.55 | 13.53 | 292% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.63 | 9.33 | 478% |
| Returns for 10 years | 187.08 | 93.86 | 199% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement