Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs SMDIX
FSMDX vs SMDIX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs SMDIX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$36.71
Change+$0.09 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.37B
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps I
Price$19.80
Change+$0.09 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets944.36M
FSMDX vs SMDIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. SMDIX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and SMDIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45.4B vs. SMDIX (944M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than SMDIX: FSMDX (1.25) vs SMDIX (0.32). FSMDX was incepted earlier than SMDIX: FSMDX (14 years) vs SMDIX (20 years). SMDIX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). SMDIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMDIX: FSMDX (0) vs SMDIX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.22 vs. SMDIX (-4.89). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 60.38 vs. SMDIX (25.94).
| FSMDX | SMDIX | FSMDX / SMDIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.91 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.91 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.702 | 1.904 | 457% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.4B | 944M | 4,809% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 0.32 | 385% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.22 | -4.89 | -127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.29 | 24.35 | 215% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.38 | 25.94 | 233% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.09 | 59.00 | 229% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement