Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs RCKSX
FSMDX vs RCKSX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs RCKSX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$38.27
Change+$1.11 (+2.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.87B
FSMDX vs RCKSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. RCKSX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and RCKSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 46.9B vs. RCKSX (12.7M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than RCKSX: FSMDX (1.07) vs RCKSX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than RCKSX: FSMDX (14 years) vs RCKSX (21 years). RCKSX (1.53) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FSMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. RCKSX (12.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCKSX: FSMDX (0) vs RCKSX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.78 vs. RCKSX (8.03). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 44.63 vs. RCKSX (20.62).
| FSMDX | RCKSX | FSMDX / RCKSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.25 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.53 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.683 | 5.661 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.9B | 12.7M | 369,291% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.78 | 8.03 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.55 | 41.19 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.63 | 20.62 | 216% |
| Returns for 10 years | 187.08 | 104.58 | 179% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement