Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs RCKSX
FSMDX vs RCKSX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs RCKSX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$37.54
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.78B
FSMDX vs RCKSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. RCKSX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and RCKSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45.8B vs. RCKSX (12.5M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than RCKSX: FSMDX (1.24) vs RCKSX (0.21). FSMDX was incepted earlier than RCKSX: FSMDX (14 years) vs RCKSX (21 years). RCKSX (1.53) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FSMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. RCKSX (11.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCKSX: FSMDX (0) vs RCKSX (2000). RCKSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.80 vs. FSMDX (9.46). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 46.87 vs. RCKSX (12.19).
| FSMDX | RCKSX | FSMDX / RCKSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.25 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.53 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.433 | 14.805 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.8B | 12.5M | 366,400% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 0.21 | 581% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.46 | 12.80 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.92 | 50.84 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.87 | 12.19 | 384% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.06 | 87.74 | 172% |