Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs NTIAX
FSMDX vs NTIAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs NTIAX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$36.71
Change+$0.09 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.37B
Columbia Mid Cap Index A
Price$14.81
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.47B
FSMDX vs NTIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. NTIAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and NTIAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45.4B vs. NTIAX (2.47B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than NTIAX: FSMDX (1.25) vs NTIAX (1.02). FSMDX was incepted earlier than NTIAX: FSMDX (14 years) vs NTIAX (25 years). NTIAX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). NTIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NTIAX: FSMDX (0) vs NTIAX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.48 vs. NTIAX (-6.78). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 60.77 vs. NTIAX (3.44).
| FSMDX | NTIAX | FSMDX / NTIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.45 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.58 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.969 | 1.418 | 632% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.4B | 2.47B | 1,835% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 1.02 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.48 | -6.78 | -96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.66 | 13.18 | 399% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.77 | 3.44 | 1,765% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.66 | 3.78 | 3,586% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers