Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs NTIAX
FSMDX vs NTIAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs NTIAX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$37.32
Change+$0.30 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.78B
Columbia Mid Cap Index A
Price$15.19
Change+$0.11 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.49B
FSMDX vs NTIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. NTIAX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a StrongBuy and NTIAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45.8B vs. NTIAX (2.49B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than NTIAX: FSMDX (1.24) vs NTIAX (1.01). FSMDX was incepted earlier than NTIAX: FSMDX (14 years) vs NTIAX (26 years). NTIAX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). NTIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NTIAX: FSMDX (0) vs NTIAX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.54 vs. NTIAX (-9.33). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 48.70 vs. NTIAX (-4.24).
| FSMDX | NTIAX | FSMDX / NTIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.45 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.58 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.097 | 3.678 | 275% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.8B | 2.49B | 1,838% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 1.01 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.54 | -9.33 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.99 | 5.07 | 769% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.70 | -4.24 | -1,148% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.04 | 12.80 | 1,063% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement