Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs NTIAX
FSMDX vs NTIAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs NTIAX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$38.27
Change+$1.11 (+2.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.87B
Columbia Mid Cap Index A
Price$15.06
Change+$0.11 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.53B
FSMDX vs NTIAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. NTIAX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and NTIAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 46.9B vs. NTIAX (2.54B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than NTIAX: FSMDX (1.07) vs NTIAX (0.98). FSMDX was incepted earlier than NTIAX: FSMDX (14 years) vs NTIAX (26 years). NTIAX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). NTIAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NTIAX: FSMDX (0) vs NTIAX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.78 vs. NTIAX (1.45). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 44.63 vs. NTIAX (-8.85).
| FSMDX | NTIAX | FSMDX / NTIAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.45 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.58 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.683 | 5.094 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.9B | 2.54B | 1,850% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.98 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.78 | 1.45 | 742% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.55 | 4.74 | 834% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.63 | -8.85 | -504% |
| Returns for 10 years | 187.08 | 27.98 | 669% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers