Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs NMPAX
FSMDX vs NMPAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs NMPAX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$36.71
Change+$0.09 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.37B
Columbia Mid Cap Index Inst
Price$14.70
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.47B
FSMDX vs NMPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. NMPAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and NMPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45.4B vs. NMPAX (2.47B). NMPAX (1.26) and FSMDX (1.25) have matching dividends . FSMDX was incepted earlier than NMPAX: FSMDX (14 years) vs NMPAX (26 years). NMPAX (0.33) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). NMPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMPAX: FSMDX (0) vs NMPAX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.22 vs. NMPAX (-6.66). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 60.38 vs. NMPAX (4.28).
| FSMDX | NMPAX | FSMDX / NMPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.20 | 13% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.33 | 8% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.702 | 1.542 | 564% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.4B | 2.47B | 1,838% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 1.26 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.22 | -6.66 | -93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.29 | 13.87 | 377% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.38 | 4.28 | 1,412% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.09 | 4.92 | 2,746% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers