Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs NMPAX
FSMDX vs NMPAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs NMPAX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$37.02
Change-$0.07 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.78B
Columbia Mid Cap Index Inst
Price$14.98
Change-$0.05 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.49B
FSMDX vs NMPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. NMPAX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a StrongBuy and NMPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45.8B vs. NMPAX (2.49B). NMPAX (1.25) and FSMDX (1.24) have matching dividends . FSMDX was incepted earlier than NMPAX: FSMDX (14 years) vs NMPAX (26 years). NMPAX (0.33) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). NMPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMPAX: FSMDX (0) vs NMPAX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.54 vs. NMPAX (-9.23). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 48.70 vs. NMPAX (-3.56).
| FSMDX | NMPAX | FSMDX / NMPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.20 | 13% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.33 | 8% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.097 | 3.821 | 264% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.8B | 2.49B | 1,842% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 1.25 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.54 | -9.23 | -17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.99 | 5.67 | 688% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.70 | -3.56 | -1,368% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.04 | 14.30 | 952% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement