Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs LVOPX
FSMDX vs LVOPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs LVOPX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$37.52
Change-$0.02 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.78B
Lord Abbett Value Opportunities P
Price$17.51
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
FSMDX vs LVOPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. LVOPX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and LVOPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45.8B vs. LVOPX (1.1B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than LVOPX: FSMDX (1.24) vs LVOPX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than LVOPX: FSMDX (14 years) vs LVOPX (20 years). LVOPX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). LVOPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and LVOPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.30 vs. LVOPX (-5.09). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 46.87 vs. LVOPX (-6.11).
| FSMDX | LVOPX | FSMDX / LVOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.39 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.39 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.433 | -3.632 | -315% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.8B | 1.1B | 4,160% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.30 | -5.09 | -182% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.15 | 17.44 | 282% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.87 | -6.11 | -767% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.39 | -0.97 | -15,361% |