Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs LVOPX
FSMDX vs LVOPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs LVOPX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$38.27
Change+$1.11 (+2.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.87B
Lord Abbett Value Opportunities P
Price$18.03
Change-$0.08 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
FSMDX vs LVOPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. LVOPX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and LVOPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 46.9B vs. LVOPX (1.12B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than LVOPX: FSMDX (1.07) vs LVOPX (0.04). FSMDX was incepted earlier than LVOPX: FSMDX (14 years) vs LVOPX (20 years). LVOPX (1.39) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). LVOPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and LVOPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.78 vs. LVOPX (-2.28). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 44.63 vs. LVOPX (-8.06).
| FSMDX | LVOPX | FSMDX / LVOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.39 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.39 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.683 | 5.009 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.9B | 1.12B | 4,188% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.04 | 2,721% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.78 | -2.28 | -473% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.55 | 9.81 | 403% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.63 | -8.06 | -554% |
| Returns for 10 years | 187.08 | 12.17 | 1,538% |