Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs LVOFX
FSMDX vs LVOFX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs LVOFX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$37.32
Change+$0.30 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.78B
Lord Abbett Value Opportunities F
Price$18.81
Change+$0.25 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
FSMDX vs LVOFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. LVOFX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a StrongBuy and LVOFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45.8B vs. LVOFX (1.1B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than LVOFX: FSMDX (1.24) vs LVOFX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than LVOFX: FSMDX (14 years) vs LVOFX (18 years). LVOFX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). LVOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and LVOFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.54 vs. LVOFX (-6.35). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 48.70 vs. LVOFX (4.97).
| FSMDX | LVOFX | FSMDX / LVOFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.04 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.04 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.097 | 0.714 | 1,414% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.8B | 1.1B | 4,149% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.54 | -6.35 | -24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.99 | 17.95 | 217% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.70 | 4.97 | 980% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.04 | 8.36 | 1,627% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement