Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs LLSCX
FSMDX vs LLSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs LLSCX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$37.20
Change+$0.06 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.03B
Longleaf Partners Small-Cap
Price$29.36
Change-$0.15 (-0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets740.06M
FSMDX vs LLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. LLSCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and LLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45B vs. LLSCX (740M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than LLSCX: FSMDX (1.26) vs LLSCX (0.11). FSMDX was incepted earlier than LLSCX: FSMDX (14 years) vs LLSCX (37 years). LLSCX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). LLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than LLSCX: FSMDX (0) vs LLSCX (10000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.21 vs. LLSCX (3.93). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 55.45 vs. LLSCX (33.85).
| FSMDX | LLSCX | FSMDX / LLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.95 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.04 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.246 | 7.310 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 10000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45B | 740M | 6,081% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 0.11 | 1,190% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.21 | 3.93 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.46 | 37.36 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.45 | 33.85 | 164% |
| Returns for 10 years | 143.82 | 25.57 | 562% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement