Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs LLSCX
FSMDX vs LLSCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs LLSCX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$37.32
Change+$0.30 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.78B
Longleaf Partners Small-Cap
Price$29.34
Change+$0.22 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets732.13M
FSMDX vs LLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. LLSCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a StrongBuy and LLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45.8B vs. LLSCX (732M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than LLSCX: FSMDX (1.24) vs LLSCX (0.10). FSMDX was incepted earlier than LLSCX: FSMDX (14 years) vs LLSCX (37 years). LLSCX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). LLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than LLSCX: FSMDX (0) vs LLSCX (10000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.54 vs. LLSCX (-0.83). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 48.70 vs. LLSCX (31.17).
| FSMDX | LLSCX | FSMDX / LLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.95 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.04 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.097 | 7.749 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 10000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.8B | 732M | 6,257% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 0.10 | 1,198% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.54 | -0.83 | -185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.99 | 37.61 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.70 | 31.17 | 156% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.04 | 24.23 | 562% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers