Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs HFDSX
FSMDX vs HFDSX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs HFDSX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$37.32
Change+$0.30 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.78B
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps R4
Price$20.55
Change+$0.08 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets964.44M
FSMDX vs HFDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. HFDSX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a StrongBuy and HFDSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45.8B vs. HFDSX (964M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than HFDSX: FSMDX (1.24) vs HFDSX (0.03). FSMDX was incepted earlier than HFDSX: FSMDX (14 years) vs HFDSX (9 years). HFDSX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). HFDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and HFDSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.36 vs. HFDSX (-5.96). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 47.52 vs. HFDSX (20.05).
| FSMDX | HFDSX | FSMDX / HFDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.22 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.22 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.780 | 6.698 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.8B | 964M | 4,751% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 0.03 | 3,571% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.36 | -5.96 | -40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.85 | 17.66 | 226% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.52 | 20.05 | 237% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.51 | N/A | - |