Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs HFDRX
FSMDX vs HFDRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs HFDRX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$38.55
Change+$0.07 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.79B
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps R3
Price$19.00
Change+$0.04 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets966.99M
FSMDX vs HFDRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. HFDRX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and HFDRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45.8B vs. HFDRX (967M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than HFDRX: FSMDX (1.10) vs HFDRX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than HFDRX: FSMDX (14 years) vs HFDRX (9 years). HFDRX (1.52) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). HFDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and HFDRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.17 vs. HFDRX (1.12). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 47.23 vs. HFDRX (5.91).
| FSMDX | HFDRX | FSMDX / HFDRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.52 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.52 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.197 | 3.939 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.8B | 967M | 4,736% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.17 | 1.12 | 1,268% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.82 | 13.77 | 333% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.23 | 5.91 | 799% |
| Returns for 10 years | 188.12 | N/A | - |