Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs HFDCX
FSMDX vs HFDCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs HFDCX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$36.71
Change+$0.09 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.37B
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps C
Price$18.22
Change+$0.08 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets944.36M
FSMDX vs HFDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. HFDCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and HFDCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45.4B vs. HFDCX (944M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than HFDCX: FSMDX (1.25) vs HFDCX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than HFDCX: FSMDX (14 years) vs HFDCX (9 years). HFDCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). HFDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFDCX: FSMDX (0) vs HFDCX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.22 vs. HFDCX (-6.42). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 60.38 vs. HFDCX (18.31).
| FSMDX | HFDCX | FSMDX / HFDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.91 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.91 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.702 | 1.110 | 784% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.4B | 944M | 4,809% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.22 | -6.42 | -97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.29 | 19.63 | 266% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.38 | 18.31 | 330% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.09 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement