Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs HFDCX
FSMDX vs HFDCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs HFDCX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$37.52
Change-$0.02 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.78B
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps C
Price$17.66
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets951.91M
FSMDX vs HFDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. HFDCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and HFDCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45.8B vs. HFDCX (952M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than HFDCX: FSMDX (1.24) vs HFDCX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than HFDCX: FSMDX (14 years) vs HFDCX (9 years). HFDCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). HFDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFDCX: FSMDX (0) vs HFDCX (2000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.46 vs. HFDCX (-3.44). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 46.87 vs. HFDCX (3.70).
| FSMDX | HFDCX | FSMDX / HFDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.91 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.91 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.433 | -1.998 | -572% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.8B | 952M | 4,811% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.46 | -3.44 | -275% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.92 | 13.86 | 353% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.87 | 3.70 | 1,267% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.06 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement