Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs GSMCX
FSMDX vs GSMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs GSMCX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$38.27
Change+$1.11 (+2.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.87B
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Instl
Price$37.04
Change-$2.22 (-5.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.11B
FSMDX vs GSMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. GSMCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and GSMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 46.9B vs. GSMCX (1.11B). FSMDX (1.07) and GSMCX (1.02) have matching dividends . FSMDX was incepted earlier than GSMCX: FSMDX (14 years) vs GSMCX (31 years). GSMCX (0.84) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). GSMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSMCX: FSMDX (0) vs GSMCX (1000000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.78 vs. GSMCX (0.29). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 44.63 vs. GSMCX (-0.17).
| FSMDX | GSMCX | FSMDX / GSMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.84 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.84 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.683 | 5.738 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.9B | 1.11B | 4,241% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.02 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.78 | 0.29 | 3,681% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.55 | 8.18 | 483% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.63 | -0.17 | -26,862% |
| Returns for 10 years | 187.08 | 36.10 | 518% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement