Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs GCMUX
FSMDX vs GCMUX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs GCMUX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$38.27
Change+$1.11 (+2.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.87B
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value R6
Price$36.99
Change-$2.23 (-5.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
FSMDX vs GCMUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. GCMUX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and GCMUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 46.9B vs. GCMUX (1.1B). FSMDX (1.07) and GCMUX (1.03) have matching dividends . FSMDX was incepted earlier than GCMUX: FSMDX (14 years) vs GCMUX (11 years). GCMUX (0.83) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). GCMUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCMUX: FSMDX (0) vs GCMUX (5000000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.78 vs. GCMUX (0.28). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 44.63 vs. GCMUX (-0.16).
| FSMDX | GCMUX | FSMDX / GCMUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.83 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.83 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.683 | 5.746 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.9B | 1.1B | 4,279% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.03 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.78 | 0.28 | 3,906% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.55 | 8.20 | 482% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.63 | -0.16 | -27,679% |
| Returns for 10 years | 187.08 | 36.13 | 518% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement