Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs FZAMX
FSMDX vs FZAMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs FZAMX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$38.27
Change+$1.11 (+2.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.87B
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Z
Price$26.34
Change+$1.39 (+5.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.67B
FSMDX vs FZAMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. FZAMX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and FZAMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 46.9B vs. FZAMX (1.67B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than FZAMX: FSMDX (1.07) vs FZAMX (0.31). FSMDX was incepted earlier than FZAMX: FSMDX (14 years) vs FZAMX (12 years). FZAMX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FZAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and FZAMX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.78 vs. FZAMX (4.64). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 44.63 vs. FZAMX (8.18).
| FSMDX | FZAMX | FSMDX / FZAMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.58 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.58 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.683 | 6.483 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.9B | 1.67B | 2,815% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.31 | 340% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.78 | 4.64 | 232% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.55 | 22.19 | 178% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.63 | 8.18 | 546% |
| Returns for 10 years | 187.08 | 66.66 | 281% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement