Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs FZAMX
FSMDX vs FZAMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs FZAMX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$38.55
Change+$0.07 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.79B
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Z
Price$25.82
Change-$0.04 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.59B
FSMDX vs FZAMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. FZAMX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and FZAMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45.8B vs. FZAMX (1.59B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than FZAMX: FSMDX (1.10) vs FZAMX (0.33). FSMDX was incepted earlier than FZAMX: FSMDX (14 years) vs FZAMX (12 years). FZAMX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FZAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and FZAMX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.17 vs. FZAMX (5.05). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 47.23 vs. FZAMX (7.80).
| FSMDX | FZAMX | FSMDX / FZAMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.58 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.58 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.197 | 4.781 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.8B | 1.59B | 2,882% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.33 | 335% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.17 | 5.05 | 280% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.82 | 25.06 | 183% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.23 | 7.80 | 606% |
| Returns for 10 years | 188.12 | 62.39 | 302% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement