Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs FZAMX
FSMDX vs FZAMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs FZAMX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$36.54
Change-$0.66 (-1.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.03B
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Z
Price$24.88
Change-$0.59 (-2.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.56B
FSMDX vs FZAMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. FZAMX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and FZAMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45B vs. FZAMX (1.56B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than FZAMX: FSMDX (1.26) vs FZAMX (0.51). FSMDX was incepted earlier than FZAMX: FSMDX (14 years) vs FZAMX (12 years). FZAMX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FZAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and FZAMX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.61 vs. FZAMX (-4.15). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 55.70 vs. FZAMX (20.44).
| FSMDX | FZAMX | FSMDX / FZAMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.58 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.58 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.424 | 4.772 | 218% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45B | 1.56B | 2,894% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 0.51 | 245% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.61 | -4.15 | -111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.53 | 23.10 | 188% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.70 | 20.44 | 273% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.06 | 34.82 | 405% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement