Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs FTZFX
FSMDX vs FTZFX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs FTZFX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$38.48
Change+$0.08 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.79B
FullerThaler Behvrll Uncnstd Eq R6
Price$66.64
Change-$0.10 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets386.38M
FSMDX vs FTZFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. FTZFX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and FTZFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45.8B vs. FTZFX (386M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than FTZFX: FSMDX (1.10) vs FTZFX (0.12). FSMDX was incepted earlier than FTZFX: FSMDX (14 years) vs FTZFX (7 years). FTZFX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FTZFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTZFX: FSMDX (0) vs FTZFX (1000000). FTZFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.87 vs. FSMDX (15.11). FTZFX return over 5 years is better than : 95.87 vs. FSMDX (45.72).
| FSMDX | FTZFX | FSMDX / FTZFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.91 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.14 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.981 | 6.579 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.8B | 386M | 11,865% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.12 | 912% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.11 | 28.87 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.52 | 97.77 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.72 | 95.87 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 187.52 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers