Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMD vs SCHA
FSMD vs SCHA Comparison
Open Charts FSMD vs SCHA
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
Price$43.12
Change-$0.67 (-1.53%)
Volume$109.6K
Net Assets1.81B
Schwab US Small-Cap ETF™
Price$27.42
Change-$0.67 (-2.39%)
Volume$4.4M
Net Assets18.49B
FSMD vs SCHA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMD vs. SCHA commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMD is a Buy and SCHA is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHA has more net assets: 18.5B vs. FSMD (1.81B). SCHA has a higher annual dividend yield than FSMD: SCHA (9.577) vs FSMD (7.554). FSMD was incepted earlier than SCHA: FSMD (7 years) vs SCHA (16 years). SCHA (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than FSMD (0.16). FSMD has a higher turnover SCHA (11.00) vs SCHA (11.00).
| FSMD | SCHA | FSMD / SCHA | |
| Gain YTD | 7.554 | 9.577 | 79% |
| Net Assets | 1.81B | 18.5B | 10% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.16 | 0.04 | 400% |
| Turnover | 38.00 | 11.00 | 345% |
| Yield | 1.38 | 1.41 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FSMD | SCHA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FSMD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSMD has been closely correlated with BLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSMD jumps, then BLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FSMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSMD | 100% | +0.23% | ||
| BLD - FSMD | 71% Closely correlated | +1.49% | ||
| EME - FSMD | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| EXAS - FSMD | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.29% | ||
| XPO - FSMD | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.61% | ||
| DKS - FSMD | 34% Loosely correlated | +2.23% | ||
More | ||||
SCHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHA has been loosely correlated with THC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHA jumps, then THC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHA | 100% | -0.11% | ||
| THC - SCHA | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.84% | ||
| FIX - SCHA | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.95% | ||
| CNM - SCHA | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.98% | ||
| NTRA - SCHA | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.34% | ||
| TXRH - SCHA | 33% Poorly correlated | +2.20% | ||
More | ||||