| FSMD | SCHA | FSMD / SCHA | |
| Gain YTD | 11.557 | 15.155 | 76% |
| Net Assets | 1.91B | 19.6B | 10% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.04 | 375% |
| Turnover | 38.00 | 11.00 | 345% |
| Yield | 1.34 | 1.38 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 16 years | - |
| FSMD | SCHA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 80% | 6 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VGSR | 10.39 | 0.07 | +0.63% |
| Vert Global Sustainable Real Estate ETF | |||
| XHYE | 38.55 | N/A | N/A |
| BondBloxx US High Yield Energy Sctr ETF | |||
| RMCA | 24.22 | N/A | N/A |
| Rockefeller California Municipal Bd ETF | |||
| SPD | 39.80 | -0.01 | -0.03% |
| Simplify US Equity PLUS Dwnsd Cnvxty ETF | |||
| CSQ | 19.29 | -0.04 | -0.21% |
| Calamos Strategic Total Return | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSMD has been closely correlated with BLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSMD jumps, then BLD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FSMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSMD | 100% | +1.16% | ||
| BLD - FSMD | 71% Closely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| EME - FSMD | 48% Loosely correlated | +2.00% | ||
| EXAS - FSMD | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| XPO - FSMD | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| DKS - FSMD | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.28% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHA has been loosely correlated with THC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHA jumps, then THC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHA | 100% | +0.99% | ||
| THC - SCHA | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| FIX - SCHA | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| CNM - SCHA | 45% Loosely correlated | +2.88% | ||
| NTRA - SCHA | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.89% | ||
| TXRH - SCHA | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.69% | ||
More | ||||