Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMCX vs NAESX
FSMCX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSMCX vs NAESX
Tributary Small/Mid Cap Institutional
Price$16.46
Change+$0.10 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.57M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$116.62
Change+$0.82 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
FSMCX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMCX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMCX is a Buy and NAESX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. FSMCX (40.6M). NAESX pays higher dividends than FSMCX: NAESX (1.28) vs FSMCX (0.00). FSMCX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSMCX (6 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FSMCX (5.72) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). FSMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: FSMCX (1000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.22 vs. FSMCX (2.36). FSMCX return over 5 years is better than : 77.75 vs. NAESX (69.32).
| FSMCX | NAESX | FSMCX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.17 | 553% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 5.72 | 0.17 | 3,365% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.290 | 1.432 | -230% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.6M | 148B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.28 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.36 | 12.22 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.84 | 37.83 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.75 | 69.32 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 108.83 | - |