Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMBX vs NAESX
FSMBX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSMBX vs NAESX
Tributary Small/Mid Cap Instl Plus
Price$16.57
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets30.81M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$117.71
Change-$0.46 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.28B
FSMBX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMBX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMBX is a Buy and NAESX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. FSMBX (30.8M). NAESX pays higher dividends than FSMBX: NAESX (1.28) vs FSMBX (0.15). FSMBX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSMBX (6 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FSMBX (1.62) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSMBX: NAESX (3000) vs FSMBX (5000000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.46 vs. FSMBX (-1.42). FSMBX return over 5 years is better than : 71.80 vs. NAESX (66.66).
| FSMBX | NAESX | FSMBX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.17 | 529% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 0.17 | 953% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.585 | 2.781 | -93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 3000 | 166,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.8M | 153B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 1.28 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.42 | 8.46 | -17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.92 | 34.15 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.80 | 66.66 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 114.71 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement