Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMBX vs NAESX
FSMBX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSMBX vs NAESX
Tributary Small/Mid Cap Instl Plus
Price$15.89
Change-$0.15 (-0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.82M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$119.91
Change-$2.72 (-2.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.58B
FSMBX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMBX vs. NAESX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMBX is a StrongBuy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. FSMBX (28.8M). NAESX pays higher dividends than FSMBX: NAESX (1.22) vs FSMBX (0.15). FSMBX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSMBX (6 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FSMBX (1.34) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSMBX: NAESX (3000) vs FSMBX (5000000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.42 vs. FSMBX (-11.75). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 48.22 vs. FSMBX (41.96).
| FSMBX | NAESX | FSMBX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.17 | 529% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.17 | 788% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.758 | 6.726 | -86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 3000 | 166,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.8M | 162B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 1.22 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.75 | 1.42 | -826% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.18 | 33.14 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.96 | 48.22 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 137.58 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement