Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMBX vs NAESX
FSMBX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSMBX vs NAESX
Tributary Small/Mid Cap Instl Plus
Price$16.58
Change-$0.10 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets30.56M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$117.84
Change-$0.44 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.18B
FSMBX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMBX vs. NAESX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMBX is a Buy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 154B vs. FSMBX (30.6M). NAESX pays higher dividends than FSMBX: NAESX (1.25) vs FSMBX (0.14). FSMBX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSMBX (6 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FSMBX (1.62) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSMBX: NAESX (3000) vs FSMBX (5000000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.15 vs. FSMBX (-1.18). FSMBX return over 5 years is better than : 62.76 vs. NAESX (57.53).
| FSMBX | NAESX | FSMBX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.17 | 529% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 0.17 | 953% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.585 | 2.494 | -104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 3000 | 166,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.6M | 154B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.14 | 1.25 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.18 | 9.15 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.62 | 20.39 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.76 | 57.53 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 112.59 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement