Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WOOPX
FSMAX vs WOOPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WOOPX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$101.01
Change+$0.91 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.05B
JPMorgan SMID Cap Equity I
Price$17.96
Change-$0.15 (-0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets326.3M
FSMAX vs WOOPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WOOPX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and WOOPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. WOOPX (326M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WOOPX: FSMAX (0.44) vs WOOPX (0.34). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WOOPX: FSMAX (14 years) vs WOOPX (34 years). WOOPX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). WOOPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WOOPX: FSMAX (0) vs WOOPX (1000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.87 vs. WOOPX (-3.44). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 62.49 vs. WOOPX (4.74).
| FSMAX | WOOPX | FSMAX / WOOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.84 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.96 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.145 | -1.683 | -603% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 326M | 12,577% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.34 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.87 | -3.44 | -462% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.87 | 16.85 | 415% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.49 | 4.74 | 1,319% |
| Returns for 10 years | 116.34 | -7.36 | -1,581% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers