Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WMGRX
FSMAX vs WMGRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WMGRX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$103.20
Change-$1.70 (-1.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.03B
Nomura Mid Cap Growth R
Price$21.53
Change-$0.30 (-1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.88B
FSMAX vs WMGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WMGRX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and WMGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. WMGRX (3.88B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WMGRX: FSMAX (0.43) vs WMGRX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WMGRX: FSMAX (14 years) vs WMGRX (20 years). WMGRX (1.45) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). WMGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX (0) and WMGRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.13 vs. WMGRX (-13.44). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.85 vs. WMGRX (-35.51).
| FSMAX | WMGRX | FSMAX / WMGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.29 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.45 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.415 | -6.829 | -211% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 3.88B | 1,056% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.13 | -13.44 | -53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.85 | -6.23 | -993% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.85 | -35.51 | -95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.92 | 18.06 | 658% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers