Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WMGCX
FSMAX vs WMGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WMGCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$102.38
Change+$1.40 (+1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.03B
Nomura Mid Cap Growth C
Price$17.51
Change-$0.15 (-0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.91B
FSMAX vs WMGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WMGCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and WMGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. WMGCX (3.91B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WMGCX: FSMAX (0.43) vs WMGCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WMGCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs WMGCX (25 years). WMGCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). WMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMGCX: FSMAX (0) vs WMGCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.33 vs. WMGCX (-14.54). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.03 vs. WMGCX (-44.47).
| FSMAX | WMGCX | FSMAX / WMGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.79 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.95 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.125 | 1.980 | 562% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 3.91B | 1,048% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.33 | -14.54 | -23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.85 | -5.25 | -988% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.03 | -44.47 | -74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.82 | -8.47 | -1,202% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement