Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WMGCX
FSMAX vs WMGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WMGCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$105.57
Change-$0.03 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.06B
Nomura Mid Cap Growth C
Price$15.29
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.77B
FSMAX vs WMGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WMGCX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and WMGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. WMGCX (3.77B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WMGCX: FSMAX (0.57) vs WMGCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WMGCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs WMGCX (26 years). WMGCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). WMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMGCX: FSMAX (0) vs WMGCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.16 vs. WMGCX (-11.16). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 24.22 vs. WMGCX (-49.70).
| FSMAX | WMGCX | FSMAX / WMGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.79 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.95 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.897 | 4.014 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 3.77B | 1,064% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.16 | -11.16 | -154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.27 | -16.63 | -362% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.22 | -49.70 | -49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 156.77 | 1.66 | 9,432% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers