Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WMGCX
FSMAX vs WMGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WMGCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$98.68
Change-$2.68 (-2.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.46B
Macquarie Mid Cap Growth C
Price$17.51
Change-$0.40 (-2.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.07B
FSMAX vs WMGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WMGCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and WMGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.5B vs. WMGCX (4.07B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WMGCX: FSMAX (0.43) vs WMGCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WMGCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs WMGCX (25 years). WMGCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). WMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMGCX: FSMAX (0) vs WMGCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.78 vs. WMGCX (-11.03). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.78 vs. WMGCX (-40.26).
| FSMAX | WMGCX | FSMAX / WMGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.79 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.95 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.598 | 4.310 | 269% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.5B | 4.07B | 1,020% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.78 | -11.03 | -61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.30 | -14.80 | -360% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.78 | -40.26 | -111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.36 | -4.22 | -2,565% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement