Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WMGAX
FSMAX vs WMGAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WMGAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$102.71
Change-$0.26 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.03B
Nomura Mid Cap Growth A
Price$23.34
Change-$0.04 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.76B
FSMAX vs WMGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WMGAX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and WMGAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. WMGAX (3.76B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WMGAX: FSMAX (0.43) vs WMGAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WMGAX: FSMAX (14 years) vs WMGAX (26 years). WMGAX (1.20) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). WMGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMGAX: FSMAX (0) vs WMGAX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.55 vs. WMGAX (-9.36). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 26.24 vs. WMGAX (-36.73).
| FSMAX | WMGAX | FSMAX / WMGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.04 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.20 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.303 | -7.086 | -188% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 3.76B | 1,091% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.55 | -9.36 | -113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.63 | 0.78 | 8,702% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.24 | -36.73 | -71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.30 | 20.31 | 582% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers