Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WAMFX
FSMAX vs WAMFX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WAMFX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$101.01
Change+$0.91 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.05B
Boston Trust Walden Midcap
Price$24.03
Change+$0.27 (+1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets174.75M
FSMAX vs WAMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WAMFX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and WAMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. WAMFX (175M). WAMFX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: WAMFX (0.50) vs FSMAX (0.44). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WAMFX: FSMAX (14 years) vs WAMFX (14 years). WAMFX (1.02) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). WAMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.20 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAMFX: FSMAX (0) vs WAMFX (100000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.87 vs. WAMFX (1.30). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 62.49 vs. WAMFX (41.67).
| FSMAX | WAMFX | FSMAX / WAMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.00 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.02 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.145 | 4.660 | 218% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 175M | 23,429% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.50 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.87 | 1.30 | 1,220% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.87 | 30.75 | 227% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.49 | 41.67 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 116.34 | 79.92 | 146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers