Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WAMFX
FSMAX vs WAMFX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WAMFX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$88.99
Change-$1.54 (-1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.61B
Boston Trust Walden Midcap
Price$22.75
Change-$0.34 (-1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets163.92M
FSMAX vs WAMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WAMFX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and WAMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. WAMFX (164M). WAMFX (0.52) and FSMAX (0.50) have matching dividends . FSMAX was incepted earlier than WAMFX: FSMAX (14 years) vs WAMFX (14 years). WAMFX (1.02) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). WAMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.20 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WAMFX: FSMAX (0) vs WAMFX (100000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.48 vs. WAMFX (3.83). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 60.48 vs. WAMFX (41.45).
| FSMAX | WAMFX | FSMAX / WAMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.00 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.02 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.080 | -0.915 | 227% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.6B | 164M | 22,927% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.52 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.48 | 3.83 | 300% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.57 | 19.99 | 238% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.48 | 41.45 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.64 | 56.02 | 119% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement