Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs UMBMX
FSMAX vs UMBMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs UMBMX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$101.01
Change+$0.91 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.05B
Carillon Scout Mid Cap I
Price$26.10
Change+$0.30 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.2B
FSMAX vs UMBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. UMBMX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and UMBMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. UMBMX (3.21B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than UMBMX: FSMAX (0.44) vs UMBMX (0.42). FSMAX was incepted earlier than UMBMX: FSMAX (14 years) vs UMBMX (19 years). UMBMX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). UMBMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than UMBMX: FSMAX (0) vs UMBMX (10000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.92 vs. UMBMX (1.35). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 63.96 vs. UMBMX (35.12).
| FSMAX | UMBMX | FSMAX / UMBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.95 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.99 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.147 | 12.597 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 10000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 3.21B | 1,279% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.42 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.92 | 1.35 | 1,252% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.41 | 38.45 | 186% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.96 | 35.12 | 182% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.30 | 80.85 | 146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers