Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TRGPX
FSMAX vs TRGPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TRGPX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$102.38
Change+$1.40 (+1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.03B
Nuveen Quant Mid Cap Growth Premier
Price$22.50
Change+$0.08 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets738.14M
FSMAX vs TRGPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TRGPX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and TRGPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. TRGPX (738M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TRGPX: FSMAX (0.43) vs TRGPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TRGPX: FSMAX (14 years) vs TRGPX (16 years). TRGPX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TRGPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX (0) and TRGPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.33 vs. TRGPX (-0.89). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.03 vs. TRGPX (-22.71).
| FSMAX | TRGPX | FSMAX / TRGPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.65 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.65 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.125 | 5.167 | 215% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 738M | 5,556% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.33 | -0.89 | -376% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.85 | 28.38 | 183% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.03 | -22.71 | -145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.82 | 3.82 | 2,666% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement