Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TRGPX
FSMAX vs TRGPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TRGPX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$100.75
Change-$0.22 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.44B
Nuveen Quant Mid Cap Growth Premier
Price$22.95
Change-$0.08 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets781.07M
FSMAX vs TRGPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TRGPX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and TRGPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.4B vs. TRGPX (781M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TRGPX: FSMAX (0.44) vs TRGPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TRGPX: FSMAX (14 years) vs TRGPX (16 years). TRGPX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TRGPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX (0) and TRGPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.72 vs. TRGPX (11.30). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 48.84 vs. TRGPX (-13.43).
| FSMAX | TRGPX | FSMAX / TRGPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.65 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.65 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.860 | 7.797 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.4B | 781M | 5,301% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.72 | 11.30 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.57 | 45.25 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.84 | -13.43 | -364% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.74 | 8.94 | 1,160% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement