Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TQSMX
FSMAX vs TQSMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TQSMX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$100.75
Change-$0.22 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.44B
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq
Price$24.71
Change+$0.04 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets925.92M
FSMAX vs TQSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TQSMX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and TQSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.4B vs. TQSMX (926M). TQSMX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: TQSMX (0.51) vs FSMAX (0.44). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TQSMX: FSMAX (14 years) vs TQSMX (10 years). TQSMX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TQSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.60 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQSMX: FSMAX (0) vs TQSMX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.97 vs. TQSMX (1.15). TQSMX return over 5 years is better than : 60.50 vs. FSMAX (49.17).
| FSMAX | TQSMX | FSMAX / TQSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.87 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.90 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.103 | 9.240 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.4B | 926M | 4,471% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.51 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.97 | 1.15 | 1,129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.92 | 39.72 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.17 | 60.50 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.19 | N/A | - |