Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TMDPX
FSMAX vs TMDPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TMDPX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$102.38
Change+$1.40 (+1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.03B
AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth N
Price$17.42
Change+$0.15 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.64B
FSMAX vs TMDPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TMDPX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and TMDPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. TMDPX (1.64B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TMDPX: FSMAX (0.43) vs TMDPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TMDPX: FSMAX (14 years) vs TMDPX (21 years). TMDPX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TMDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMDPX: FSMAX (0) vs TMDPX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.91 vs. TMDPX (-4.18). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.55 vs. TMDPX (-22.51).
| FSMAX | TMDPX | FSMAX / TMDPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.07 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.07 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.654 | 10.744 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 1.64B | 2,505% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.91 | -4.18 | -117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.94 | 21.22 | 254% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.55 | -22.51 | -145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.60 | -6.70 | -1,562% |