Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TCMHX
FSMAX vs TCMHX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TCMHX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$101.36
Change-$0.06 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.46B
Nuveen Quant Mid Cap Growth I
Price$23.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets772.74M
FSMAX vs TCMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TCMHX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and TCMHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.5B vs. TCMHX (773M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TCMHX: FSMAX (0.43) vs TCMHX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TCMHX: FSMAX (14 years) vs TCMHX (10 years). TCMHX (0.60) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TCMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TCMHX: FSMAX (0) vs TCMHX (100000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.78 vs. TCMHX (5.33). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.78 vs. TCMHX (-15.89).
| FSMAX | TCMHX | FSMAX / TCMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.60 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.60 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.598 | 7.983 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.5B | 773M | 5,369% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.78 | 5.33 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.30 | 34.54 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.78 | -15.89 | -282% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.36 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement