Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TCMHX
FSMAX vs TCMHX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TCMHX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$100.75
Change-$0.22 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.44B
Nuveen Quant Mid Cap Growth I
Price$23.10
Change-$0.08 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets781.07M
FSMAX vs TCMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TCMHX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and TCMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.4B vs. TCMHX (781M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TCMHX: FSMAX (0.44) vs TCMHX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TCMHX: FSMAX (14 years) vs TCMHX (10 years). TCMHX (0.60) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TCMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TCMHX: FSMAX (0) vs TCMHX (100000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.72 vs. TCMHX (11.33). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 48.84 vs. TCMHX (-13.39).
| FSMAX | TCMHX | FSMAX / TCMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.60 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.60 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.860 | 7.843 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.4B | 781M | 5,301% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.72 | 11.33 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.57 | 44.71 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.84 | -13.39 | -365% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.74 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement